UAA Stock Analysis: Why Under Armour Inc A Scored 17% in Stock Value Finder

Research updated: October 22, 2026

Analyzing Under Armour Inc A (UAA): An Educational Research Review

Welcome to this detailed stock research review of Under Armour Inc A (UAA). This article is designed as an educational guide provided by StockValueFinder.com to help investors understand how to evaluate a company using a disciplined, metric-driven approach. Rather than relying on brand popularity or sentiment, we focus on hard financial data to determine if a stock meets the criteria for quality, safety, and value.

Under Armour Inc A operates within the Consumer Cyclical sector, specifically in the Apparel Manufacturing industry. In this review, we will dissect the company's current financial standing based on the StockValueFinder screening system, explaining not only the numbers but the logic behind why certain metrics are considered attractive or risky.

Why the StockValueFinder Score Matters

The StockValueFinder score is a composite metric that aggregates several different financial tests—including profitability, valuation, and solvency—into a single percentage. This score is intended to provide a quick snapshot of how many of the system's "quality hurdles" a stock has cleared.

Under Armour Inc A (UAA) currently holds a StockValueFinder score of 17%. Based on this score, the system has assigned a rating of AVOID.

In a disciplined screening process, a high score (typically 70% or above) suggests that a company is performing well across most key financial categories. A low score, such as 17%, indicates that the company failed the majority of the fundamental tests. For educational purposes, it is important to understand that a low score does not necessarily mean a company will go bankrupt, but it does suggest that the stock does not currently meet the criteria for a high-quality, value-oriented investment.

EPS Strength and Consistency

Earnings Per Share (EPS) is a critical metric because it tells us how much profit a company generates for each share of its stock. Consistency in EPS is often more important than a single high-growth year; steady or increasing earnings suggest a predictable business model and reliable management.

For Under Armour Inc A, the EPS test result is: Did not pass.

While the specific historical EPS figures were not supplied for this review, the system recorded a failure for this test. When a stock fails the EPS test, it generally means the company's earnings are either inconsistent, negative, or declining.

To learn how to evaluate this for other stocks: Imagine Company A has an EPS of $2.00, $2.10, and $2.20 over three years. This shows a steady upward trend. Now imagine Company B has an EPS of $5.00, -$1.00, and $0.50. Even though Company B had one very high year, the volatility makes it a riskier bet. StockValueFinder seeks the consistency seen in Company A.

ROIC and Capital Efficiency

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is perhaps the most important metric for determining if a company is actually creating value. It measures how efficiently a company uses its capital (both debt and equity) to generate profit.

Under Armour Inc A has a reported ROIC of -14.78%.

StockValueFinder generally prefers an ROIC of 10% or higher. A positive ROIC indicates that the company is earning more on its investments than the cost of the capital it used to make those investments. A negative ROIC, such as -14.78%, indicates that the company is effectively losing money on the capital it has deployed into the business.

Educational Example

– Company X has an ROIC of 15%. This means for every $100 of capital invested, the company generates $15 in profit. – Company Y has an ROIC of 4%. This means for every $100 invested, it only generates $4. – Company X is significantly more efficient at creating wealth. Under Armour's negative ROIC places it in a position where capital is being eroded rather than grown.

Interest Coverage and Financial Safety

Interest coverage is a solvency ratio that describes how easily a company can pay the interest on its outstanding debt. It is calculated by dividing a company's earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) by its interest expenses.

The interest coverage test for Under Armour Inc A resulted in: Did not pass.

StockValueFinder prefers an interest coverage ratio of 6 or higher. A higher ratio provides a "margin of safety," ensuring that even if earnings dip temporarily, the company can still service its debt without risking default.

Educational Example

– If a company has an interest coverage of 8x, it earns eight times more than it owes in interest payments. This is considered healthy. – If a company has an interest coverage of 2x, it only earns twice what it owes. A small drop in revenue could leave the company unable to pay its creditors. Because UAA did not pass this test, the system views its current financial safety margin as insufficient.

Debt Payback and Balance Sheet Discipline

The debt payback metric estimates how many years it would take for a company to pay off its total debt using its current annual earnings. This is a measure of balance sheet discipline.

Under Armour Inc A has a debt payback value of -3.64 years.

StockValueFinder prefers a debt payback period of 3 years or less. A low positive number (e.g., 1.5 years) is highly attractive because it shows the company could clear its debts quickly. However, a negative number—as seen with UAA's -3.64—typically indicates that the company is not generating enough profit to pay down its debt; in fact, it may be losing money, making the "payback" mathematically impossible at current earnings levels.

Educational Example

– Company A can pay off its debt in 2 years. This is a strong, disciplined balance sheet. – Company B would take 10 years to pay off its debt. This is a heavy burden that may limit future growth. – Company C has negative earnings, meaning it cannot pay back the debt using current profits. This is the riskiest scenario.

Interestingly, the system marked the Debt Payback test as "Passed." In some screening contexts, this can occur if the total debt load is very low relative to assets, even if current earnings are negative. However, the negative number itself remains a point of caution for the investor.

P/E Ratio and Valuation Discipline

The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio tells us how much the market is willing to pay for every $1 of earnings. It is the primary tool for determining if a stock is "expensive" or "cheap."

Under Armour Inc A has a P/E ratio of 38.92.

For valuation discipline, StockValueFinder prefers a P/E of 15 or lower. A lower P/E often indicates a "value" stock, where the price is reasonable relative to the profits. A high P/E, such as 38.92, suggests that the stock is expensive relative to its current earnings, or that the market is pricing in massive future growth that has not yet happened.

Educational Example

– A P/E of 8 means you are paying $8 for every $1 of profit. If the business quality is sound, this is often a bargain. – A P/E of 40 means you are paying $40 for every $1 of profit. This requires the company to grow aggressively to justify the price. Under Armour failed the P/E valuation test because 38.92 is significantly higher than the preferred threshold of 15.

Moving Average Trend and Entry Timing

While the metrics above focus on "what" to buy (fundamentals), the moving average trend focuses on "when" to buy (timing). The moving average smooths out daily price fluctuations to reveal the overall direction of the stock.

The current moving average signal for UAA is: SELL / AVOID TREND. The entry signal is: N/A.

It is important to understand that a trend signal is used for timing discipline. It is not a guarantee that a stock must rise or fall, but rather a reflection of current momentum. A "Sell/Avoid" trend suggests that the stock is currently moving downward or sideways, and buying into a falling trend increases the risk of further losses.

Regarding entry areas

– Limit buy idea: N/A – Pullback zone: N/A – Risk stop / trend risk level: N/A

These fields are educational reference levels used to identify potential "value zones" or "exit points." Because these are listed as N/A, the system has not identified a technically sound entry point for this stock at the current price of $4.67.

Overall Financial Strengths and Weaknesses

When we aggregate these findings, a clear picture of Under Armour Inc A's current financial state emerges.

**Weaknesses:** – **Profitability:** The negative ROIC (-14.78%) and the failed EPS test indicate a struggle to generate efficient profits. – **Valuation:** A P/E of 38.92 is high for a company in the apparel manufacturing sector, especially one that is not passing its profitability tests. – **Safety:** The failure of the interest coverage test suggests a lack of a sufficient cushion to handle debt obligations. – **Momentum:** The "Sell/Avoid" trend signal indicates that the market is not currently pushing the price upward.

**Strengths:** – The only metric that passed the system's screen was the Debt Payback test. This suggests that while earnings are currently poor, the overall debt structure may not be in a state of immediate crisis relative to the company's size.

Risks and Limitations

Investing in companies with low StockValueFinder scores carries significant risks. When a company fails the ROIC, EPS, and Interest Coverage tests simultaneously, it suggests a fundamental struggle with the core business model. In the Consumer Cyclical sector, companies are highly sensitive to economic downturns and changes in consumer spending patterns.

The primary risk for UAA, based on these numbers, is the combination of high valuation (P/E) and low efficiency (ROIC). Paying a premium price for a business that is currently eroding capital is generally contrary to the principles of value investing.

Educational Conclusion

The analysis of Under Armour Inc A (UAA) serves as a textbook example of why multiple metrics must be used together. If an investor looked only at the stock price ($4.67), they might assume the stock is "cheap." However, the P/E ratio of 38.92 reveals that the stock is actually expensive relative to its earnings. Similarly, while the debt payback test passed, the negative ROIC and failed interest coverage test reveal that the company is struggling to generate the cash flow needed to operate efficiently.

By applying a strict set of hurdles—ROIC > 10%, P/E < 15, and Interest Coverage > 6—investors can filter out high-risk opportunities and focus on companies with proven financial discipline. In the case of UAA, the 17% score and "Avoid" rating reflect a failure to meet these fundamental quality standards.

This article is for research and educational purposes only. It is not personal financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.


Research links: Yahoo Finance | Seeking Alpha | Finviz | SEC Filings

Omar Gemani editorial portrait
Omar Gemani
Demographic Cycle Analyst · StockValueFinder Editorial Persona

Specializing in global financial markets, macroeconomic trends, and equity valuation, Omar Gemani brings a disciplined, research-driven perspective to investment analysis. His editorial approach emphasizes company fundamentals, earnings sustainability, financial strength, and long-term growth potential. Combining fundamental analysis with broader economic indicators, Omar evaluates investment opportunities while highlighting market uncertainty, valuation risks, and the importance of capital preservation.

Scroll to Top